He carried out the punishment or was one of those who must bear witness to the establishment of a punishment, so he testified about it or carried it out, so he does not carry it out except out of mercy and from the Most Merciful Name in the right of the one who limited it and the one witnessed, not out of revenge and seeking relief. The position of this name does not necessitate it, so it does not give him the status of this person. God Almighty said in the story of Abraham. Indeed, I fear that a torment from the Most Gracious will afflict you.

[ The level of the Throne and the veils of blindness ]

And whose place is this? Knowing Him and this Name, the Most Merciful, one looks at Him and sees from the secrets a taste of what is between the relationship of the Istiwaa to the Throne and the relationship of the Iyin to the All-Amma. Are they on the same definition or different? And He knows what the Truth has of the attributes of majesty and gentleness together between the Istiwaa and the Istiwaa, since He was in the Istiwaa and there is no Throne, so it is described as being equal to Him. Then He created the Throne and established Himself upon it by the Name Most Gracious, and the Throne has a limit that distinguishes it from Al-Amma, which is the name Lord, and Al-Amma has a limit that distinguishes it from the Throne, and there must be a transition from one attribute to an attribute, so what was His description, the Most High, between Al-Amma and the Throne, or by what relationship appeared between them, since each one of them was distinguished from Its owner is its definition and reality, just as the cloud that has air above it and air below it, which is the thin cloud that is carried by the air below and above it, is distinguished from the cloud that has air above it and air below it, so it is unmovable darkness.