The other, the disagreement is in the phrase, not in the fact, and the disagreement is only considered in the meanings. As for their approval of the manner, it is like their approval of the question with what, and they use as evidence for that the Almighty’s saying, “We will empty for you, O weighty ones,” and His saying, “Indeed, Allah has an eye, and our eyes, and a hand, and in His hand is the scale. He lowers and raises.”

p> These are all conditions, even if they are unknown due to the lack of suspicion in that. As for their permissibility of asking “lam,” which is a question about the cause, it is due to God Almighty’s saying, “And I did not create the jinn and mankind except that they should worship me,” so this is the blame of the cause and the reason. This is in the answer to the one who asked why God created the jinn and mankind. So God said to this questioner, “to worship me,” meaning to worship me. Whoever claims prohibition in pronouncing these expressions, then he must have evidence, so it will be said to all of the legislators who are permissible and forbidden. All of you have said and what is correct, and nothing you have said is forbidden or permissible, and you have to do with it. It is better to refrain from ruling by prohibition or permissibility. This is with the legislators. As for the non-legislators among the wise, then delve into it with them. This is not permissible unless the Sharia permits or obliges it. However, if there is no word from the law regarding engaging in it with them, then there is no way to actually engage in it with them. The ruling on that depends, so the one who engages in it is not judged to be right or wrong, and likewise with the one who abandons engaging in it, since there is no ruling. Except for Sharia