To him as required by the evidence
« Issue» [the absolute nothingness of the possible]
The nothingness of the possible that precedes the judgment on its existence is not what is meant, but nothingness What compares it legally in its state of existence is that if existence had not been, then that nothingness would have been applied to it. This is what is meant by the state of the existence of the possible due to the permissibility of nothingness being associated with it, and the non-possibility that is not intended is that which is in opposition to the existence of the necessary for its own sake, because the rank of absolute existence corresponds to the absolute nothingness of the possible since it does not have the permissibility of existence. In this rank, and this in the existence of divinity and nothing else
« Issue” [multiplicity of ancients]
It is not impossible in the mind for the existence of an ancient who is not a god. If it does not exist, then who The path of hearing only
« Issue » [Specifying the existence of the possible]
The fact that the one who specifies what he wants to exist is possible is not specifying his existence insofar as it is existence, but from Since it is attributed to a possible thing, it is permissible to attribute it to another possible thing. Existence in terms of the absolutely possible, not in terms of a possible thing, is neither intended nor a reality at all except through some possible thing, and if it is due to some possible thing, then it is not intended as such, but in terms of being attributed to something possible and nothing else.
« Issue » [custom reason]