That is, I kindled a fire from the stove when I lit it. Ibn Umar disliked ablution with sea water and said that tayammum is more pleasant to me than it.

[ The true vision of things And the correct ruling on it ]

If God were to reveal it to the eyes of creation today, they would see it blazing with fire, but God reveals what He wills and hides what He wills, so that it may be known that God has power over all things and that God encompasses all things in knowledge and in abundance. This pious family sees the forbidden food, the one with preserved piety, as a pig or a virgin, and the drink as wine, he does not doubt what he sees, and his sitter sees it as a piece of good bread, and the drink sees fresh water. I wish I had poetry. Who is the possessor of the correct sense, who is the possessor of imagination? Is the one who has perceived the legal ruling an image or is he the one who has perceived the tangible? It usually remains as it is.

[ The Mu'tazila doctrine of beauty and ugliness ]

This is what strengthens the Mu'tazila doctrine that what is ugly It is ugly for oneself, and goodness is good for oneself, and the correct realization is only for the one who recognizes the forbidden drink as wine. If it were not that it was ugly for oneself, then this revelation would not be valid for its owner. And if his action was the same, the discourse relates to forbiddenness and ugliness, that food would not have appeared to be a pig, for the action did not fall on the part of the accountable person, for God revealed its image to him, and that It is so ugly that he does not want to eat it, and this is exactly what one imagines for someone who perceives it as food as it normally is, but this person has more right in the Sharia, so he knows with certainty that the one who sees it as food as he normally is.