The person with taste must see that abandoning the pursuit of the world and desire for it has a divine effect on his heart. If the matter did not exist with God and considering what is correct, it would have an effect on the divine manifestation of the person in this state, which is correct.

Let us say that the asceticism we mentioned has a status and a state. Its divine status is absolute, and it is his asceticism in every divine name that prevents him from his servitude. The divine is restricted to the quality of distancing himself from the rule of this name upon him, and the Rahmani is spending it on what he deserves, I mean this one who abstains from it. As for the kingdom of being a Muslim, then asceticism in The universes, which is the furthest, furthest veil. As for tyranny, from his being a believer, it is asceticism in himself, which is the lowest, closest veil. As for the kingdom, from his being a doer of good, then it is asceticism in everything other than God, and here the veil is lifted for the sect.

Abu Yazid Al-Akbar said, “Asceticism is not a position for me. I was an ascetic for three days. The first day I asceticized in this world, and the second day I asceticized in the hereafter, and the third day I asceticized in everything other than God. Then the truth called me, ‘What do you want?’ I said, ‘I want not to want, because I am what is desired and you are what is desired.’” This statement was criticized by some of the people of the path and ignorance of Abu Yazid’s standing in this regard. We have discussed his intention by this statement and demonstrated the corruption of this statement, I mean the statement of the person objecting to it in other places .

It is one of the recommended positions for the servant as long as it is not revealed to him. If the veil of the eye of his heart is revealed, he does not asceticize, and he should not asceticize, for the servant does not asceticize in what he was created for, and he is not an ascetic except one who asceticizes in what he was created for, and this is not valid, as asceticism is the one who says it. Ignorance in the essence of the truth, because what is not mine I cannot be characterized by asceticism in, and what is mine I cannot separate myself from, so where is the asceticism? Let us say that the author of this ruling is this asceticism that deserves this name, and we have in this ascetic position

The fault is on you and you do not know it *** For asceticism is like my Witr prayer

And the lamp of your soul is its attached light*** With all the matter in the universe

Asceticism is abandonment and abandonment is known *** as holding what is in the palm clenched

The earth is his grip, and he is the rich, so where is *** abandonment? It is impossible for you. It is imposed.

The right is not blessed with blessings, for you are for them *** and you have renounced this. The word “exposure ”

Asceticism has no rank in knowledge *** leaving it among the people of the community is obligatory .

Know that abandoning abandonment is abstinence, and asceticism is abandonment, and abandoning asceticism is abandoning abstinence, for it is the same as returning you to what you abstained from, because true knowledge returns you to it, and the situation seeks it, so it has no truth in the interior of the matter, but it has some ruling on the surface, so this amount of it is valid. What remains is abstinence, which is constipation. Abandoning asceticism out of desire for what is being held or not out of desire, so people’s conditions differ regarding it .

Whoever withholds it, not out of desire, then he is an ascetic who is faithful to withholding the rights of others until he returns them to their owners at the appointed, decreed times. This may be based on discovery and correct knowledge of the details of their owners, or it may not be except that he does not take any of them for himself, since he is like this. And whoever withholds from A desire for what is held, and they are two men. One of them has returned from the position of asceticism, without a doubt, due to an illness he caused in himself. This is not a thing, and the other man is the prophets and the most perfect of the saints, so they held on to a mystical insight that produced for them something that he cherished due to the abstinence of knowledge and the display of perfection, not from miserliness and weak certainty . /p>

God sent upon Job a man of golden locusts, and they fell on him, so he began to collect them in his garment. Then God revealed to him, “I was no

And whoever abstains from asceticism except to seek the greater, then abstains from the least. Say, “The enjoyment of this world is little, so where is the asceticism?” So they left this world only out of fear lest He should visit them in the Hereafter. This is the essence of greed and desire for what is imagined to be asceticism, and this is the position of abandoning asceticism. As for its condition, it is asceticism in this world, and for this it is not proven.