knowledge is not the expression certainty. Knowledge is annexed to certainty through this difference, making the relation valid in expressions, not meaning.
Whoever devised this contrivance did so only through his deficient understanding of the meanings expressions indicate by convention. Had he known this, he would have known that what the expression knowledge indicates differs from what certainty indicates. With this established, you know the meaning of the knowledge, eye, and truth of certainty.
(The Sign, Witnessing, and the Ruling’s Binding Force)
Know further that certainty is what is sought in this question. Hence these three are annexed to it and revolve around it. Whoever has stability established for him with God, in God, through God, alongside God must have a sign of this annexed to certainty, particular to it and indicating nothing else. This is the knowledge of certainty.
That sign, its attachment to certainty, and its being particular to it must be witnessed. This is the eye of certainty. Its ruling must have binding force within this eye and this knowledge. Knowledge disposes only within what it must dispose in; the eye looks only toward and into what it must look at. This is the truth of certainty, which it makes binding upon knowledge and the eye.
(What Admits the Genitive Relation to Certainty)
Certainty is everything established, settled, and unshakable, of whatever kind, creation or Real. It has knowledge, an eye, and truth—that is, its ruling’s binding force. Except
