Eat and sleep

And if man is the one who unites his eye and his animal soul, but God has given each of them a right that belongs to him, then the right of the eye here is sleep, and the right of the plant soul is nourishment, which is eating, so nothing is joined to anything, for sleep Nothing takes the place of eating, nor does eating take the place of sleep, so nothing is joined to anything.

The one who sees the addition of one thing to another thing sees the addition of sleep to eating, for eating is a cause of sleep due to the moisturizing vapors that it generates that cause sleep, so the eye gets its right and the soul its right. So there is nothing wrong with joining gold to silver in order to get the right from that sum.

Who says that there is no zakat on the two partners on their money until each one of them has a quorum, and I say that? And who says that the joint money has the same ruling as one man’s money?

If work is done by a human being, it has no right to God and there is no zakat on it.

Because God Almighty says, “I am of no use to partners over polytheism, so whoever does a deed in which he associates others with me, then I am innocent of it. ” /p>

He is the one who committed polytheism and said, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, “Whoever says this for God and for your faces, then it is for your faces, and God has nothing to do with it

The quorum for jointness is not taken into account, as the two partners are in the ruling of separation, even if they are connected, then the connection is the evidence of the existence of the separation, since if it were not for the separation, there would be no connection. And if the ruling is for separation and one of them does not reach what he has in his wealth, the quorum is not obligatory on him. Zakat is not required, even if it is required. You only ask for money from the person responsible for releasing it .

Do you not see that the money in the treasury does not have zakat due to the people sharing it with the quorum in it and the arrival of the year if the imam takes possession of it and does not divide it for the benefit he saw in that? When he considered the people participating in it, the share of not one of them reached the quorum and the owner of the money was not determined, so if he appointed him The imam was paid what reached the quorum. He had left the treasury and its owner was appointed, so that ruling was removed. If a year had passed, he paid his zakat. End of Part Fifty-Four.

The legislator ruled that camels are devils, so he obligated zakat on them so that they would be purified from this lineage, since zakat purifies the owner of wealth from the characteristic of miserliness, demonization, distance. It is said to be the well of Shatun if it is far from the bottom, and Satan was named because of his distance from God’s mercy when he refused and was arrogant and was one of the disbelievers .

If deeds and deeds are not attributed to God, then they are far from God, so zakat is due on them, and God has the right to return them to Him, Glory be to Him. If they are returned to Him, they acquire the garb of goodness, so it is said that God’s deeds are all good, and zakat is obligatory for the Mu’tazili in terms of his belief that He created the deeds of His servants for them, and for Al-Ash’ari it is obligatory. He must pay zakat to add his earnings at work to himself .

And there was a sheep in every five sheep, and the fifth is the exact zakat on paper, which is a quarter of a tenth, so the ruling on the number that was zakat was also to be paid as zakat, like someone who sees zakat in the money collections, so he takes out a dirham from every four dinars, and out of forty dirhams, a dirham, and just as a dirham is paid out of gold in the money gifts, not the paper. Five camels are also of the type of gold, but not of their type.

Likewise, the right of God is taken from a predator by burning with fire and cutting off in the case of theft, and the responsible soul is the thief and is not of the type of predator and is purified from the rule of theft by cutting off the hand, just as five camels are purified by removing a sheep and it is not of the type of purity. The ruling of aqasa has been presented, so it does not need to be mentioned here.

A young person is not obligated to perform the task until he reaches puberty. There is no zakat on young camels. A young child learns to pray and beats on it when he is ten years old. He only beats when it is obligatory and puberty is what has happened. So zakat is obligatory on young camels of sound mind if it is found among a boy, and if he has not reached puberty, then whoever has reached puberty. Puberty was considered to be waived, and those who considered solidity of reason more obligatory .