Do you not see that the money in the treasury does not have zakat due to the people sharing it with the quorum in it and the arrival of the year if the imam takes possession of it and does not divide it for the benefit he saw in that? When he considered the people participating in it, the share of not one of them reached the quorum and the owner of the money was not determined, so if he appointed him The imam was paid what reached the quorum. He had left the treasury and its owner was appointed, so that ruling was removed. If a year had passed, he paid his zakat. End of Part Fifty-Four.