The effect of disbelief here is on faith, and it was not stronger than it. Rather, since the matter was as we mentioned regarding what was in the disbeliever’s belief that God was right, and from the attribution of divinity to the sun, he was an unbeliever, so the truth took into account the meaning that they intended, and from there it was proven that they were singled out for prostration rather than the believers, and the abrogation of the prostration of the believers. At that time, it is for God that it is a trace of faith in faith, not a trace of disbelief in faith .

Who says that it is not permissible to circumambulate without purity, whether intentionally or by mistake? And who says that it is sufficient, and it is desirable for him to repeat it, and he must sacrifice, because they have unanimously agreed that purity is part of the Sunnah of circumambulation, and who says that if he circumambulates without ablution, his circumambulation is sufficient if he does not know, and it is not sufficient for him if He knew, and some of them stipulated the purity of the garment for the circumambulator, just as it was stipulated for the one praying. What I say is that it is permissible to circumambulate without ablution for a man and a woman, unless she is menstruating, in which case she does not circumambulate, and if she circumambulates, it is not sufficient, and she is disobedient, given the text in this regard. What has been reported legislating purity for circumambulation, except what was mentioned specifically regarding a menstruating woman,

Know that there is no state in existence in which God has no face in which His existence is preserved from all that exists by Himself with that divine face, His purity. For there is nothing in existence, by virtue of reality, except that which is pure, for the Holy Name accompanies existing things, and by Him His saying is confirmed, and to Him all matters are returned, so worship Him and put your trust in Him, and your Lord is not unaware of what You are creating a division between God and His servants. There should not be a barrier between the servant and his master, and nothing should come between the servant and the master except with goodness. I met some tourists on the seashore between Laqit Marsa and the lighthouse. He told me that in this place I met a person from Al-Abdal by chance while he was walking on the waves of the sea, so I greeted him and he replied. Ali, peace be upon him, and there was great injustice and injustice in the country, so I said to him, “Oh, what do

Is the believer lying? He said, “There is no true news, for the liar is not truthful in what he is lying about, so understand. Menstruation is a lie to the soul by agreement, and tawaaf is a state of faith, so the menstruating woman does not circumambulate, as we say regarding the imam of a sinner, that it is not permissible to lead him in a state of immorality, without disagreement, for whoever is a sinner in a state of immorality.” He performed the ritual ablution for him, then he performed ablution according to Islamic law and entered ihram by praying behind an imam. He is in obedience to God, and it is not permissible for us to call him a sinner in that case. We did not pray behind a sinful imam, and so did Abdullah bin Omar, whom they use as evidence in praying behind a sinner, and they were wrong. Al-Hajjaj is not a sinner if he performs what God has enjoined. He must obey him in prayer

This is an issue that the jurists have neglected and are blundering about, but they have not achieved any benefit. We have shown that no believer has ever been freed from sin that is not tainted by obedience at all, and obedience has been purified and is not tainted by disobedience. There is no disobedience unless the believer accompanies it as a disobedience that is forbidden for him to do, and belief that it is a disobedience is an act of obedience to God. Al-Hajjaj or anyone else, in the case of immorality, is a believer who is obedient to his faith, but his disobedience is weakened by resisting his obedience, and in the event that he prays or obeys in any of his actions, he is not a sinner, but rather he is obedient, so he who has erased God from his heart prefers immorality to faith and obedience, with immorality weakening over obedience due to the similarity of belief in the fact that this is the case. The act is immoral, so they said: It is not permissible for a sinner to l

The most astonishing thing about this matter is that I am commanded to have good thoughts of people and are forbidden to have bad thoughts of My servants. We have seen that someone whom we know is immoral has performed ablution and prayed, and when the name of immorality was pronounced upon him while worshiping him, and where is the good opinion from the bad opinion of him, and the future, we have no knowledge of it in him, and the past? We do not know what God did to him, and the ruling is due to the obedience that he is obedient to, so a good opinion is better for the servant if he is, and there is a need for curiosity. Someone whom I trust in his religion told me about a man, a jurist, an imam, and an extravagant speaker. He said to me, “I entered upon him in a gathering where alcohol was being served while he was drinking.” With the group, the wine was emptied, and it was said to him, “Reach out to so-and-so who comes to us with wine.” He said, “I will not do it. I have never