Either on his behalf, or to him, or by himself, according to his situation, especially the people of God’s path, for they are permissible in the case of a recommendation or obligation, so it is not permissible for them to do so at all, so there is no one among God’s people whose scales are on moderation, and the human being is The tongue of the scale, in which it is necessary to lean toward the side of the one who calls for the truth, and this is the consideration of whoever says that breaking the fast in what is called a disease, and that God is with the sick person with proven divine information. Do you not see him resorting to Him and mentioning Him frequently, regardless of any religion or belief, then He will necessarily incline toward Him and He will show that to you. We have explained in seeking salvation from what he is in, that man by nature, when harm touches him, seeks someone to remove it from him, and none other than God. The Almighty said: And when harm touche

As for those who consider illness to be predominant, it is the deeds that are added to the servant, for it is a tendency towards the truth in actions, since they are his. And the one who agrees and disagrees with them inclines them to the servant, whether he possesses power, character, or gain. This is a legitimate, sensory inclination, and it is their saying, “Our Lord, we believe in what You have revealed,” so they added faith to them. Finding and saying to them, “Believe in God,” confirming the authenticity of the actions they attributed to them with this addition, this is what is legitimate. This is in the same position as illness, and it is the predominant inclination because it is between truth and creation .

So who says that he breaks his fast on the day he left as a traveler, and who says that he does not break his fast on that day? The scholars have recommended that anyone who knows that he will enter the city that day enter it fasting, and if he enters it breaking his fast, they do not require expiation from him.

If the traveler departs in his behavior from the rule of a divine name that he has to the rule of another divine name that he called him to in order to bring him to it, the rule of another name that is neither the one he departed from nor the one he reaches, then he is by the rule of that name by which he walks and is with him wherever he may be. God Almighty had said, “And He is with you wherever you are.” And if that name required fasting for him, it would be by virtue of the attribute of fasting, and if it required him to break the fast, it would be by virtue of the attribute of breaking the fast. If he knew that it would happen on his day, which is the same with a fatha al-fa, in the ruling of the name that called him to it and wanted to be revealed to him, then it would be by virtue of the attribute of that. The noun of breaking the fast or fasting does not have any specific case, because circumstances differ, and there is no blame on him for that, and by God, success.

He had what he wanted in his behavior and he reached it. Does his joy at what he has achieved prevent him from thanking the one who brought him to it? If he withholds it, the ruling on him changes and he takes into account the rule of abstaining from it. If that does not prevent him, he works upon reaching it by taking into consideration the one who brought him to it, so he does not deviate from his rule and goes too far in his behavior. The characteristic that he had in his behavior was worshiping that name, an act of gratitude, not an act of devotion .

Likewise, the menstruating woman, which is the lie of the soul, is blessed with honesty, so she is purified from the lying, which is her menstruation, and menstruation is the reason for her breaking the fast. Does she go beyond the characteristic of breaking the fast by lying that is permissible, such as reconciliation between people, lying in war, and a man lying to his wife, or does it require what is honesty in what is praiseworthy, obligatory, and recommended, for forbidden honesty is like backbiting and gossiping? An example of a prohibited lie is both sin and veil. An example is someone who tells about what happened to him with his wife in bed, then tells the truth, and it is a major sin. Likewise, what we mentioned about backbiting and gossiping. End Part Fifty-Six.

The scholars differed regarding whose condition this is. Some say it is permissible for him to do so, and this is the majority, and some say it is not permissible for him to break the fast. He narrated this opinion on the authority of Suwaid bin Ghafla and others.

Since it was with us and with all of God’s people that every divine name includes all the names, that is why every divine name is described with all the divine names because it includes all of their meanings, and because every divine name has an indication of the essence as well as an indication of its own meaning, and if the matter is As we mentioned, any divine name whose authority has been imposed upon you may reveal to you the meaning of the name