If the traveler departs in his behavior from the rule of a divine name that he has to the rule of another divine name that he called him to in order to bring him to it, the rule of another name that is neither the one he departed from nor the one he reaches, then he is by the rule of that name by which he walks and is with him wherever he may be. God Almighty had said, “And He is with you wherever you are.” And if that name required fasting for him, it would be by virtue of the attribute of fasting, and if it required him to break the fast, it would be by virtue of the attribute of breaking the fast. If he knew that it would happen on his day, which is the same with a fatha al-fa, in the ruling of the name that called him to it and wanted to be revealed to him, then it would be by virtue of the attribute of that. The noun of breaking the fast or fasting does not have any specific case, because circumstances differ, and there is no blame on him for that, and by God, success.