And what Al-Jaloud said was that she was somewhat acknowledging what she said, for if that occurred by choice and not by necessity, and the event is attributed to the one from whom it occurred, a correct relationship. Indeed, We have guided him to the path, that is, We have shown him the path, and created for him will in its proper place, and attachment is a relationship that is not characterized by existence, so it is created for anyone. So it is attached to a certain matter, which is harmful to God and His Messenger, and what is called thankful or ungrateful. It is a special connection, despite the fact that the speaker is unaware of recalling all of these lineages and referring them to God by virtue of the principle. If he had invoked them, he would not have uttered them, since only an ignorant or inattentive person utters them. Then it is part of the argument. The point of God in this is that whatever possible things occurred in existence except what divine knowledge preceded

Know that among the names of God are known names, such as the known names, which are apparent, and among them are implicit pronouns, such as the kaf of the speech, the tayyah, the ta’a of the speaker, the yayah, the third person pronoun, the second person pronoun from that, the plural pronoun, such as “we have descended,” and the noon of the pronoun in the plural, such as “inna, we,” and the word “I, you, and he,” and among them are nouns indicated by verbs, and they do not. Among them are nouns such as “God mocked them” and “God mocked them” and among them are nouns that represent God, but they are God’s representatives, such as our saying: “Sarabil” protects you, “the free one” and every action attributed to a universe that is not possible, but that name is a substitute for God, because all actions belong to God, regardless of whether the action is attached to that censure. Or praise, there is no ruling on that being related to influencing what the correct knowledge gives him. F