I said: What is erasure and what is proof? We said proof is establishing the rulings of worship and establishing communication. As for erasure, it is removing the descriptions of habit and removing the cause. It is also what the truth has concealed and denied, and from it is taste.

If you said, “What is drinking,” we would say the middle part of the manifestation is from a position that calls for irrigation, and it may be from a position that does not call for irrigation, and the drinker may be in a mood that does not accept irrigation

If you say, “What is beauty?” we will say that we describe the mercy and kindness of the Divine Presence in His beautiful name, which is the beauty that has the majesty witnessed in the world .

If you say, “What is expansion?” we said, “In our view, it is the one that encompasses things but cannot be accommodated by anything,” and it was said that it is the state of hope, and it was said that it is possible and necessitated by it, indicating acceptance, mercy, and comfort, and it is the opposite of grasping .

If you said, “What is arrest,” we said the state of fear in time, and what comes and responds to the heart, necessitating it as a reference to reproach and discipline, and it is said that it takes time and what comes in time, and these two cases may exist for the people of the place .

If you said, “What is the place?” we said, “A position in the carpet is only for the people of perfection who have achieved the statuses and conditions and passed it to the status that is above majesty and beauty.” They have no adjective or adjective. It was said to Abu Yazid, “How did I become?” He said, “I have neither morning nor evening. Rather, morning and evening are for those who adhere to the attribute and no.” An attribute of me, and our companions differed regarding this statement: whether it is shatah or not, since the place necessitated it for it .

If you say, “What is the situation,” we say that it is what comes to the heart without action or seeking, and one of its conditions is that it disappears and is followed by proverb after proverb until it becomes clear, and it may not be followed by a proverb. From here arose the disagreement between the sect regarding the continuity of the conditions. Whoever sees the succession of proverbs and does not know that they are proverbs. He said its permanence and derived it from the solution, and whoever did not follow it with a proverb , he said its non-permanence and derived it from a state that changes if it ceases, and they chanted about that . ** Everything that is changed has disappeared.

It has been said that the situation changes the characteristics of the servant, so if he is firm and steadfast, then he is the one who stands .

If you say, “What is etiquette,” we say, “Sometimes they want the etiquette of the Sharia, and at times they mean the etiquette of service, and at times the etiquette of the truth. So the etiquette of the Sharia is to stand by its ceremonies, which are the limits of God, and the etiquette of service is to refrain from seeing it while exaggerating in it by seeing its course, and the etiquette of truth is to know what is yours and what is his, and the etiquette is he who is by virtue of time.” Or who knows his time