The truth requires that the monotheists who were described with the quality of monotheism should unite Him in terms of His identity, even if the manifestations are multiple, so many are the apparent ones. They do not see anything except that He is the seen and the seer, and they do not ask for anything except that He is the seeker, the seeker, and the sought, and they do not hear anything except that He is the hearer, the hearing, and the heard, so there is no crowding. There is no dispute, for the conflict is only carried by the opposite, which is the similar and the repulsive, which is the same as the similar here, since the two opposites may be something that is not like two, unlike the contrarian, so the ruling of the contrarian does not result in competition or dispute.

This is why the Truth denied that proverbs were given to it because they are opposites that contradict the reality of what it should have, and what it is called does not contradict it, as it denied the simile and said, “There is nothing like Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.” God created the apple carrying color, taste, and smell, and there is no competition in the indivisible essence, and it is impossible for it to exist. Two colors, two tastes, or two scents in that part that is not divided, then two gods are not valid because they are examples. It is valid that all names exist for the same entity because they are a difference, and a difference is capable of coming together, unlike the similar. If the meeting is impossible, then the rule of opposition is the rule of contradiction, not the rule of disagreement, since the meeting does not contradict the difference, so every meeting requires disagreement, and what does every disagreement require? The meeting

Rather, the truth requires of the monotheists not to compete, so that the Lord remains Lord and the servant a servant, so that the Lord does not compete with the servant in his servitude, and the servant does not compete with the Lord in his lordship, with the existence of the eye of the Lord and the servant. The monotheist is not created by the divine names. If you say, then it is necessary that he not accept what has come from the truth regarding his being described with descriptions. The newly introduced things, such as companionship, descent, steadfastness, and laughter, these are descriptions of servants, and I said that there is no competition, for this is divinity that has crowded out servitude. We said, “The matter is not as you claimed. What you mentioned is not descriptions of servitude. Rather, that is among descriptions of divinity in terms of its appearance in appearances, not in terms of its identity. The servant is a servant according to his origin, and lordship is

So the truth required the monotheists to unify every matter, so that competition would be eliminated, and conflict would be eliminated, and permanence would be valid for the world. Then it would be clear what is the meaning of eternity with the rationality of eternity, which is what you say continues. If not the imposed point in the line that resembles now, what is the difference between eternity and eternity, just as we do not differentiate between the past and the future? With the absence of now in time, except that the point is divinity, so it differentiates between identity and entities, and it is called manifestations, except that the point is you, so He and I are distinguished by you, so if you know this, then you are monotheist.

So give the truth what it requires of you if it requires it, and if he says to you, “Aren’t it already clear to you in the other level that there is no one but God” and you explained in that what you explained, so why did you remove this bias here? We said, “Because you called yourself someone requiring from us that we are monotheists something that does not require.” You are what He gives you. We are what we gave you. We only gave to what is required. Do not speak to us in a language other than ours, since you are the one who said, “And We have not sent a messenger except in the language of his people.” What is required in this chapter will be our witness, and another name that is not our witness will address us. This is a speech of trial and scrutiny.

The answer is that the right is called a right because it requires it from its servants in terms of their essence and in terms of their being manifestations of what is due, since the right is not sought except by the truth, which is the knowledge that occurs after the essence, and it is what the one who requires it is obligated to give if he asks for it. From it, your Lord has decreed mercy upon Himself, that is, He has made it obligatory, so it has become a right upon Him. He said, “And it is a right upon us to help the believers, for He is the truth and nothing else .

If the entities were not worthy of being manifestations, the Truth would not have appeared in them and He was not wise, there would not have been a defect in that. And if the identity were not worthy of appearing in these concrete manifestations due to the manifestation of the authority of divinity, they would not have appeared in these entities, because a thing does not appear in

So tell the truth that truth is nothing other than it, for it is truth in truth

I did not look with my eyes other than my own eyes *** for the eyes of truth are the eyes of creation