Except for the people of standing, especially those who are in the terror of that day, and as for those who act on it, such as the prophets, messengers, and callers to God, and like those who are at ease among the people of the pulpits who are not saddened by the greatest fear, and those who are protected in the pavilions of majesty behind the veil of humanity, then all of them and their likes are not among the people of standing, so the people of standing are the ones who wait. God’s ruling on them, and they answer him with this speech according to what each one of them understood.

If you united Me in appearances, then you are the ones who believe in solutions, and those who say solutions are not monotheistic, because two things have been proven: state and place. And if you united Me in the essence without the attributes and actions, then you did not unite me, for the minds do not reach it, and the information is from me, so it has not come to you, and if you united me in divinity due to the attributes it carries. The actual and the subjective, from being a single entity, are of different proportions, so since you have united me, is it with your minds or with me, and whatever it may be, you have not united me, because my oneness is not a single monotheism, neither with your minds nor with me, so your uniting me with me is my monotheism, not your uniting with your minds. How can I be judged by the command of the one who succeeded him or appointed him ?

And after you claimed my monotheism in any way or in any aspect, what did my monotheism necessitate for you? If your presence necessitated it, then you are under the rule of what it necessitated from you. You have departed from me, so where is the monotheism? If it was necessitated by my command, then my command is other than me. Then, on my hand is whoever reaches you, if you see it from me. Who among you has seen it, and if you have not seen it from me, then where is the monotheism? O you monotheists, how is this position valid for you when you are the appearances to my eyes and I am the apparent thing? And the apparent contradicts identity, so where is the monotheism? There is no unity in information, for the information is me and your objects and the conditions and lineages, so there is no unity in information. If you say in existence, then there is no unity, for existence The essence of everything that exists, and the difference in appearances indicates the difference in the

If you say there is neither known nor unknown nor existent nor non-existent, which is the essence of monotheism, we say with the same knowledge that in the division of information, whoever accepts this description has fallen under the division of information. So where is monotheism? So, O monotheists, correct the error. There is then nothing but God, and multiplicity is in then, and there is no other than Him. So where is the monotheism? If you said the monotheism is what is required in the eyes of the multitude, we said, “That is the monotheism of the plural,” so where is the monotheism, for monotheism cannot be added or added to? Prepare, O monotheists, to answer this speech if the question arises. If the people of polytheism will not be forgiven, then in reality they would not have attained that, because if they had been forgiven, they would not have said with the polytheist. So they saw the matter as it is, and if I said, “Where did the misery come from when they are in this s

The answer is what God Almighty said on the day God will gather the messengers and say, “What if you respond?” So they resorted to “We have no knowledge.” They knew that when they were directed, they called to God Almighty their nations, outwardly and inwardly, with one invitation. If they had assigned the outward ones, their statement would not have been “We have no knowledge.” Answer

Hence, all the branches of the Sharia rulings are not valid from the hypocrite, because he did not respond inwardly to his call like what he answered outwardly, and the branches of the Sharia rulings are valid from the sinner who believes in his inwardness, so we know that what is intended for the inner Sharia, but with a specific condition, which is that faith encompasses all the branches of the rulings and their foundations, so if he believes in some and disbelieves. With some, such faith is not considered a true disbeliever .

Then God Almighty says to the messengers, “What have you responded to if His words to them are in accordance with what He has charged them with calling to Him?” If the questioner wants what He said to the messengers regarding their being close servants, then He speaks to them with what He speaks to those who are close to His servants. Then His words are to the close messengers to whom you believe to be close. Did you believe that Your closeness to us, your happiness, your knowledge of yourself, or my knowledge

If you think that you are approaching us, then you have identified me, and I am without limit, and this tongue that I mention in this chapter is only the words of truth for the one who calls to God with insight, just as he said, “Call to God with insight, I, and whoever follows me, this is the tongue of the one who follows him in his call to God on behalf of me.” On his authority, it is as if he were the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, calling to God with insight in the same way as the Messenger called, because they are heirs, but we said this because .