A green spot in which there was a hot spring, so he liked that, of course. Then it occurred to him that if he had prayed two rak’ahs in it, he would have fallen out of the group and would not have returned to that state after that, because he did not ask for worship for what the truth deserves. Rather, the motive for that request was the impression in that place because it was good, of course. So he was punished. Whoever saw this. He said: There is no reward except from God, since the work itself requires a reward and it must be

Who says that it is obligatory for him and who says that it is not obligatory for him until he is freed? In the first place, I say that even if his master prevents him with the ability to leave him, then the master among us is among those who turn away from the path of God .

When Ahmad ibn Hanbal was imprisoned during the days of distress, if he heard the call to Friday prayers, he would perform ablution and go out to the prison door. If the jailer prevented him and turned him back, he had an excuse that prevented him from performing what he was obligated to do, and so does the servant, for he is among the people mentioned in the verse.

Know that whoever is enslaved by the universe, there is no need for him to enslave him with a lawful ruling, such as striving for the rights of others and striving to thank those among the creatures who have bestowed upon him a blessing with which he has enslaved him. This is a slave who is not obligated to have the right, for in performing a duty, a lawful right, he is required by that time, and he is a slave with God. For someone other than God, on the command of God, to fulfill the right of God, and if his enslavement was for a psychological purpose and a whim of my being, and the legitimate right has no smell in it, then he must respond to the truth in what God has called him to perform Hajj in that action, so if he looks at the face of the truth in that purpose, that is his emancipation, then Hajj is obligatory for him, even if it is absent from him. This was because he was negligent and did not respond, and he was disobedient because he knew that God had spoken to him about

And if his appearance at that time is that he appears and the one being addressed with the Hajj is apparent in him and not in person, Hajj is not obligatory for him, and this is the sincere servant of God, and this is a bondage in which there is no emancipation. Do you not see that the Lawgiver said that the boy performs Hajj and the slave performs Hajj before he is emancipated and then dies before emancipation? If the boy dies before reaching puberty, that Hajj is written for him as part of its obligatory duty. This is because, through death, he was freed from the slavery of others, so he was freed by death. At that time, that Hajj is written for him by performing an obligation, even if he performed it at a time other than the time when it is obligatory for the one who says so.

The divine names are divided into two categories in ruling in the world. Among the names are those whose ruling extends as long as God wills and is long. So if you attribute them from the beginning to the end, you say that it is expansive and lax, like the obligatory one that is expanded in time. Every obligatory one that is expected in the expanded time is its time, whether you place it at the beginning of time, at the end, or in what Between them, everyone has his time and you have performed a duty, so accompanying the ruling of the Divine Name on the condemned person is expanded, like knowledge in its association with information and like will. Likewise, if the person in charge, if he wishes, he does it in the first, and if he wishes, he does it in the last, and it is not said here, and if he wanted, he did not do it, because the reality of an action is an effect, and the fact that he did not do it is accompanied by the original, so there is no effect. The will here has a concr

The soul wants to perform Hajj to God, which is looking into knowing God through the means of witnesses. Does the aspirant enter into that by himself or does he not enter into that except with a guide? The guide is one of two people, either of abundant intellect and he is in the position of a husband to a woman, or he has knowledge of the law and he is a mahram, so the answer is not devoid of this seeker. That it is intended to be attracted or not to be. If it is attracted, then divine providence accompanies it, so it does not need a guide of its kind, which is rare. And if it is not attracted, then it must be entered by the hand of a position either reason or law. If he is seeking first knowledge, then reason must be in accordance with legal obligation, even if he seeks it. The second knowledge, so the Sharia must take his hand in this. With the first knowledge, the Sharia is established with him, and with the second knowledge, the truth is established with him, and half of the r