And if his appearance at that time is that he appears and the one being addressed with the Hajj is apparent in him and not in person, Hajj is not obligatory for him, and this is the sincere servant of God, and this is a bondage in which there is no emancipation. Do you not see that the Lawgiver said that the boy performs Hajj and the slave performs Hajj before he is emancipated and then dies before emancipation? If the boy dies before reaching puberty, that Hajj is written for him as part of its obligatory duty. This is because, through death, he was freed from the slavery of others, so he was freed by death. At that time, that Hajj is written for him by performing an obligation, even if he performed it at a time other than the time when it is obligatory for the one who says so.