He knew about it. There is no time that we can estimate except that it is permissible to change what was put into it. If it is not by the will of the setter, not by himself, and if it is in this manner, the one who says that it will happen will not have definitive knowledge. And if it happens, then he does not know what is in the heart of the setter except in two ways: Either it is. The one who knows what is in himself is the truthful one, but after the appearance of the thing, he knows that if it had not been in the soul of the one who created it, it would not have occurred, and the one who created it is God Almighty. The believing scholar says in such a situation that if God keeps the arrangement as it is and proceeds in the stages according to His destiny and does not violate the custom in it, then there is no This matter that we mentioned must happen, and for this reason it denies knowledge of the astrologer and everything like it from the share of the Messengers and others .<

So the light of the moon, when it was benefited from the sun, is similar to the soul in receiving from God the light of faith and revelation. And if the soul is perfected and the manifestation is correct for it in the opposite direction, and it is a full moon night, it may turn to its nature, and the darkness of its nature appears in it, and that darkness prevents it from its rational, faith-based, divine light, just as a shadow did. The earth is between the moon, which is in the position of the soul, and the light of the sun. As much as you look at its nature, it is veiled from the light of divine faith, so that is its eclipse. This is the eclipse of the moon. As for the eclipse of the sun, it is the eclipse of the mind, for God created it to make sense of God what He takes from Him, so the soul, which is in the position of the moon, came between it and the truth. God Almighty in terms of what is taken from His name, Light, Glory be to Him, from the fact that its attribution to t

For this reason, eclipses have no ruling on Earth except in the places where the eclipse appears, and as for the places where the eclipse does not appear, there is no ruling for it to appear and no effect, i.e., at that time God does nothing in the world of the beings that He does when the eclipse appears, since there is no agent. Except God, matters are determined by the Almighty, the All-Knowing, the work of the Wise, to the point that if the sun was given an account that it would be eclipsed at night, that eclipse would not have a ruling on the surface of the earth in which the eclipse did not appear. Likewise, the eclipse of the moon is in the ruling. Likewise, the outer and inner parts of a person may be affected by the eclipse in deeds, that is, in the knowledge that is sought. Acting according to the legitimate rulings may occur in the sciences that relate to the inner and have no apparent ruling, so it affects the place of its attachment, either in the science of action or

If the diligent person makes a mistake, then he is in the same position as the eclipse that occurs in the absence of the one who is eclipsed, so he is not subject to any burden and is rewarded. And if the text appears to him and he leaves it to his opinion or to his clear analogy in his claim, then he has no excuse before God and he is sinful, and it is the apparent eclipse that has the effect determined by the scholars of rulings regarding the course of the planets. Most of this is the case with the imitating jurists who said to them, “Do not imitate us, but follow the hadith.” If an opposition to what we have ruled reaches you, then the hadith is our doctrine, even if we do not rule anything except with evidence that appears to us to be evidence, and we are not obligated to do anything other than that. But you are not obligated to follow us, but you are obligated to ask us. And at every time in a single calamity, the ruling may change according to the mujtahid. That is why he us