God Almighty said that prayer was prescribed for the believers at a specific time, that is, it was imposed at a specific time, whether it was broad or narrow, then it is specific, and it must be said “timed.” Whoever deviates from an obligatory prayer beyond its appointed time, whether he is among the people or remembers, he will never make up for it and his obligation will not be absolved. So whoever prays the legitimate prayer, since the time is one of the conditions for the validity of that prayer, then he should multiply the voluntary voluntary prayers after repentance, and there is no need to make up for it according to our view, due to the expiration of its time, which is a condition for its validity, and the time of the forgetful and sleepy person, the time when he remembers and wakes up from his sleep, and he is performing it, and he must not be called a judge based on the consideration that the jurists see, not according to Whatever the language gives, there is no differe

Let us say that as for the time of the noon prayer, the scholars agreed in Sharia that the time of noon before which it is not permissible is noon, and they differed regarding it in two places: at the end of its extended time and at its desired time. As for the end of its extended time, there are those who say that it is for the shadow of everything to be like it, and among the people of this opinion. Whoever says that that example, which is the end of the time of noon, is the beginning of the afternoon prayer, and who among them says that it is the end of the time of noon, especially since the beginning of the time of the afternoon is only two parables, and that what is between the parable and the two parables is not suitable for the noon prayer, and as for its desired time, then there is one who says that the beginning of the time for the separate prayer is better, and who There is someone who says that the beginning of time is better for alone and in groups, except in extreme h

Considering it to be equal is the controlled slave standing in the place of consideration without any preference as to what he does, i.e. with what intention he intends to worship. Is this considered fulfilling what is obligatory upon him of the right of servitude and the fact that he is controlled, or is he considered what obligates him thereby to be fulfilling the right of his master and his Lord? So he is in the state of equalization without any preference. If the sun no longer appears, it is more likely for him to worship Him because of the blessings that lordship deserves over servitude from the time of rising to the time of equator, so he worships Him in gratitude for this blessing, and if he looks at its disappearance with an eye of irony, seeking sunset on his behalf and the veil being lowered before him, his servant is humiliated, poor, broken, and seeking to be seen, then he will cease to exist. He watches for it until sunset, and from sunset, he watches for its effects

As for the end of the extended time, it is the last of the rulings on the Divine Name specific to that time, which is the Manifest Name, just as the beginning of the noon is the ruling on the first Divine Name in its appearance related to legitimate worship until the shadow of everything becomes like it, and it is the end of time. Likewise is the ruling on the Divine Name if it rises. This servant is in his special worship of Him at this time, and He has fulfilled it in such a way that if it is met with it, it will be like Him. That is, there is no ruling left in the divine name that is specific to it at this time except that its effect is apparent in this servant. The ruling of this divine name on this servant has passed, so the time of noon has ended and the time of afternoon has entered. It is the rule of another name, between the two names, an imaginary distinction that is indivisible, intelligible, and non-existent, and it is an isthmus between them.

The Messenger of