As for what is disliked, avoid it, whether by action or omission, and what is permissible is your choice. If you are overwhelmed by the desire for profits, avoid what is permissible and work with what is obligatory or recommended. However, if you act in what is permissible, act in it with the knowledge that it is permissible and that if the legislator had not permitted it to you, he would not have made it permissible for you. Whatever you act on, you will be rewarded for what is permissible, not in terms of it being permissible except in terms of your belief in it that it is a law from God. The ruling does not transfer after the death of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, for the ruling is the essence of the law, and that door has been closed. What is permissible is permissible, neither obligatory nor prohibited. Never, and the same applies to every one of the rulings. If a thought comes to you regarding an obligation, go to it without a doubt, for

Induction has a limit in meanings*** that applies to the strong among men .

He has a ruling and does not give you knowledge *** So his appearance is like the position of shadows

Competition of evidence with a people in it *** And where is the eye compared to the person who is an example ?

Confronting suspicions, and indeed, one of them *** will give you descent to the lowest place

So do not judge by extrapolation absolutely *** So what is the eye of a gazelle like a gazelle

And if sciences appear by induction *** then what is the ruling on concealment like that of a gazelle

Muslim narrated in his Sahih that God said, “The angels interceded, the prophets interceded, the believers interceded, and He remains the Most Merciful of those who are merciful. ”

So he called himself, the Almighty, the Most Merciful, and said that he is the best of forgivers. And he said in the Sahih, “I am as my servant thinks of me, so let him think good of me. ”

So if we establish the existence that the honorable origins do not produce anything except good morals, such as benevolence to the benefactor, forgiving the wrongdoer, pardoning the wrongdoer, removing an offense, accepting an apology, forgiving the offender, and the likes of this, which are among the good morals, and we established that and found that there is no mistake in the words of the Arab poet. In that

the horses run on their horses

and the truth is more worthy of the quality of morals than the creatures, so here the validity of the induction into the divine

As for the sickness of induction, it is not valid in beliefs, since their foundation is based on clear evidence. If we were to infer everyone from whom a workmanship appears, we would find him a body, and we would say that the world is the work and action of the Truth. We have followed the craftsmen, and we have not found a maker except one who has a body, for the Truth is a body, God is greatly exalted above that, and we have followed the evidence. In modern matters, we did not find a knower in and of himself. Rather, the evidence indicates that there is no knower except through an attribute in addition to his essence that is called knowledge, and its ruling regarding the one who has it is that he is a knower, and we have learned that the Truth is a knower, so he must have knowledge, and that knowledge is an attribute in addition to himself that is subsisting with him. No, rather it is. God is the All-Knowing, the Living, the Powerful, the All-Aware, the All-Aware. All of this is