And it does not exist, even if it is non-existent, then what is its presence, if it is possible, then there is no difference between it and this eye upon which existence has been attributed. Existence, in terms of what is non-existent in this presence, needs existence, and this follows and leads to the impossible, which is that this eye does not exist, and it has existed. This eye has gone out of the presence of possibility, so what is the matter?

Know that the existence of this eye is like the image in the mirror. It is not the eye of the beholder and nothing other than the eye of the beholder, but the place in which it is visible is in it and by the observer with the sickle in it. This image appears, so it is a mirror in terms of itself, and the observer is a viewer in terms of himself, and the apparent image varies according to the diversity of the eye appearing in it, like a mirror if It used to be taken as a length, and the image would be seen at its length, while the observer in himself was in a different way from that image and in his own image in a way, so when we saw the mirror it had a ruling on the image in itself, and we saw the observer disagreeing with that image from the aspect of our knowledge that the observer in himself is what the mirror’s essence affected him, and when he was not affected, it was not. That image is the eye of the mirror and not the eye of the beholder. Rather, it appeared from the rule o

Gathering people under one imam*** The proof of one God

So if someone other than God claims his position *** that is evidence of corrupt imagination

Far from it, where is the one knowledgeable person who *** does not accept the lineage that is in the evidence < /p>

The correct mind does not accept someone who *** gives Sharia from the presence of excess