And he was wretched, if someone said: How can a call be from a divine name when the universe stops answering him despite his weakness and acceptance of divine power? We say that his refusal to answer it was not in terms of himself and his reality because he is always oppressed, but because he was under the oppression of a divine name, that name did not allow him to answer from He called him, and the dispute occurred between the divine names, and they are competent, and the ruling is for the one who has the hand, which is the name that is in his hand at the time the other name is called, so this is stronger in the case. If you say, then why should he be held accountable for repudiation? We say because he claimed repudiation for himself and did not add it to the divine name that is under his power. If you say, then the matter remains. For he refused to subjugate the name of my God, and there was repudiation of it in this so-called one. We said, “You have spoken the truth, but he was

Know that the call is in levels, and each level has a specific instrument. The tools are the hamza, yā, yā, ya, hayā, and any soft yaā’. The closest in rank is the hamza, and the farthest is hayā. The call may or may not be accompanied by a warning. If the call is by any, it is an indefinite article, so it is necessary to give a warning because the call only asks for definition, which is With the same caller, the H must be accompanied by the warning to Ay in the call because the warning is a definition, then the warning is added to the name of the calling so that the calling person knows that he is calling and not someone else. If his name is incomplete like the one, then he must have a connection, and he is the one with which he describes it in order to fulfill what is intended, and there must be a link between this connection and the connected one. So that it is known that what is meant by that call, and if it is not combined with an incomplete name, then what we have mentioned