And he was wretched, if someone said: How can a call be from a divine name when the universe stops answering him despite his weakness and acceptance of divine power? We say that his refusal to answer it was not in terms of himself and his reality because he is always oppressed, but because he was under the oppression of a divine name, that name did not allow him to answer from He called him, and the dispute occurred between the divine names, and they are competent, and the ruling is for the one who has the hand, which is the name that is in his hand at the time the other name is called, so this is stronger in the case. If you say, then why should he be held accountable for repudiation? We say because he claimed repudiation for himself and did not add it to the divine name that is under his power. If you say, then the matter remains. For he refused to subjugate the name of my God, and there was repudiation of it in this so-called one. We said, “You have spoken the truth, but he was