It disappears, and an example of its form remains in the listener’s understanding, so he imagines that the thought is remaining, just as Dhul-Nun imagined in his saying, “Am I not your Lord?” He said, “It is as if it is now in my ears.” So, that is not the speech that was heard. Rather, that remains of what the understanding took from the form of the speech, so it remained in the soul, and few of the people of God Whoever differentiates between the two forms, and since thoughts are part of the divine speech, that is why he who calls from among the people of God calls creation to God with insight, for supplication with insight cannot be except by the divine definition, and the divine definition is only speech and nothing else, so that the problem is removed even if the formation is without the word “be.” He did not have that haste in his statement, so it would be the fulfillment of a comment, which is the answer to the matter, because the one who is had insight because it is speech