Then we go back and say that the speaker lacked coloring in order to reach his goal, and he found the world of letters and movements to be receptive to what he wanted from them, knowing that they do not change their state or invalidate their reality. So the speaker imagines that he has changed the letter and what he has changed is proof of that if you stop looking at the Dal of Zayd insofar as he is a Dal. And look at it in terms of its precedence, for example, and it is devoted to it, or any verbal verb that would have been used to speak of it. It is not permissible for you to except the nominative case in it, especially since it is removed from its structure that was found on it. And whoever imagines that the subject’s signifier is the object’s signifier, or the passive signifier, has confused and believes that the first word is ‘ayn. The second is nothing like it, and whoever believes this in existence has fallen far from the truth, and perhaps something will come from this cha