As for what some of them said to me, “Sixty years ago, or as soon as God appointed me in a matter that I hated,” the sheikhs said, he referred to the permanence of satisfaction, and they used this as proof of the proven conditions, for according to them, approval is one of the conditions, and this is not valid from someone other than the infallible and the preserved, so perhaps this speaker was one of the preserved or the infallible. If it is not, then he wants to be satisfied with God’s decree in what He has established, not with every decree, for it is not necessary to be satisfied with every decree, even if you see the face of truth in it. If you are of correct vision in it, then you see the face of truth in it, but you are not satisfied with it. If you do not see it with that divine eye, otherwise you would not have seen it if you were satisfied with it and not. He approves of disbelief for His servants, so you will be protected from this state or this position, for it is lost