As for what is forbidden by text, we are commanded to avoid it because it is forbidden to consume it in relation to the one who is prohibited from it, not in the specificity of the prohibited thing, because that specific prohibited thing has been made permissible for someone else, because that other person has a characteristic that is not in the one from whom it is prohibited. He made that characteristic permissible for him by making it permissible by the legislator, so that is why we said no in the specificity of what is prohibited, for it is not A single thing is forbidden in its entirety, and that is why God Almighty said, “Except what you are forced to do.” We know that the ruling on prohibition and other matters is based on the condition of the person obligated, and in some places on the name of the forbidden. If the name is changed due to a change in the forbidden thing, the ruling on the person obligated to consume it changes, either in terms of its permissibility or obliga