Anyone who, in my view, makes a proven analogy error in principle, or makes a mistake as a diligent scholar, whether in a branch or in a principle, has misbehaved with the legislator, as he has proven his ruling, and the legislator does not prove falsehood, so it must be true, and the error should be attributed to that in proportion to the fact that he erred in the evidence of the dissenter, which was not correct when The diligent opinion is that this is evidence, and the one who is mistaken in the Sharia is one, not one in particular, so it is necessary to take what he says, and from what he says is proof of analogy. The legislator has commanded us to take it, and if he is wrong in the matter itself, then you may worship him by it, for the legislator has the right to worship as his servants want, and this is a method that is unique to us in our knowledge, although I do not We say by analogy based on our consideration, and we say by analogy based on the one whose diligence led him