Sacrifice is more appropriate in the expiation of the one who has tamattu’, because instead of tamattu’ and with the sacrificial animal the one who gives it in charity can enjoy it, and fasting is the opposite of tamattu’. As for the occasion of fasting in it, because it is tamattu’, it is permissible with the opposite of tamattu’, which is fasting, so the right in this expiation outweighs the enjoyment of the sacrificial animal in the right of the one who gives it in charity, so if it is not Then he finds that he is faced with the opposite of enjoyment, which is fasting. End of Part Seventy-Three