What is permissible is that there is no prohibition on him in disposing of it, so I am similar to the right in this capacity. If the prohibition is removed from the restriction, it is a divine attribute, and no one has the right to refrain by restricting him from exercising the right to him, since restricting it is his own disposal, then he has the right to accept what he expends in it as before restricting it, there is no difference, this is pure slavery. Purely, since he saw it in what is permissible, in that He is not prohibited from being prohibited from what is restricted from what is prohibited, I mean, he saw the divine attribute that does not accept prohibition, but rather He is the one who does what He wants, just as God Almighty resembles a restricted and forbidden one in matters that He Himself has made obligatory upon His servants in more than one place, just as He said, “Fulfill my covenant, and I will fulfill it.” With your covenant, so he included himself with us, a