The one who is deprived of acts of witnessing and revealing is obstructed and has nothing, so nothing is binding on him. If he is withheld from these witnesses and proves that through knowledge after the witnesses, such as imagining the sensed after what he had perceived by sense, then the legal rulings bind him without a doubt and it is not impossible. The ruling regarding his right is the presence of knowledge and the absence of observation, for he sees the truth as his mover and abode. Likewise, if his status is higher than this, which is for the truth to be his hearing and sight upon revelation and witnesses, then among us are those who say his ruling is the ruling of the possessor of knowledge, for God has made it obligatory upon Himself and this does not fall under the definition of duty. Whoever attaches it to witnessing the actions of God Almighty, as we have presented, is not bound by the ruling, just as it was not bound to him there. Sometimes the name of the Truth i