So whoever doubts the evidence of his mind in knowing his Lord and the evidence he heard that opposes the evidence of his mind in knowing his Lord, and he does not trust either of the two pieces of evidence because he does not think that one of the two pieces of evidence is more likely to prevail, then he will not be able to remove from himself the veracity of the frequent narrations that contradict the evidence of his mind in his knowledge of what is appropriate for the majesty of God. From the evidence of his reason, and he was not able to defend himself due to his belief, what the truth described itself as it should be for this believer due to the frequent text in it. If he had not sought for him what was reported in the prophetic report, which necessitates definiteness and contradiction of the two pieces of evidence, and he did not find a basis for preference or combination, then this is the doubter. So let him perform the two prostrations of forgetfulness, since he neglected