The Lawgiver has declared the ruling of the Mujtahid to be a legitimate ruling, so the Mujtahid’s proof of analogy is fundamental in Sharia according to what his evidence, consideration, and diligence gave him is a Shari’a ruling that should not be rejected by someone whose doctrine is not Qiyas, and if he does not say it, then the Shari’ah has established it as a ruling in the right of the one who gave it his Ijtihad. He was subjected to a response to it, for he was subjected to a response to a ruling that had been proven by the Lawgiver. Likewise, the author of analogy, if he responded to the ruling of the Zahiri in his adherence to the apparent meaning that his ijtihad had given him, then he had also rejected a ruling that the Lawgiver had established. So every diligent person must abide by what his ijtihad has led him to, and not be exposed to the error of those who disagree with him, for this is bad manners with the Lawgiver. Sharia scholars should not be ill-mannered with Sh