We said that the imitator has evidence on a special issue of the divine that contradicts what his imitation of the Sharia gave him, so that evidence does not take him away from his imitation, but rather it takes him out of his imitation by the evidence of the mind by which the Sharia is established. He does not have this specific evidence, so if the same event appears to him in what he believed in his imitation of that issue, he knows therefore that the legislator did not intend this apparent issue in this issue, and he was alerted to that by the presence of this incidental evidence, which is like the presence of water, so this is the issue if you investigate it . p