As for the internal ruling on that, the one who bases his knowledge of God on the legitimate evidence, which is a branch in evidence from the rational evidence that is the origin, and the author of the legitimate evidence does not have knowledge of what has been proven that the Sharia is evidence in knowledge of God, so it is weak in evidence, even if He called it pure water and a good date. This is due to the mixing of the two evidences, and the imitator is not able to separate the two evidences. Insofar as that mixing includes rational evidence, it is permissible to take it into account, so ablution with date wine is permissible. And in terms of ignorance of what is included in it, it is not permissible to take it as he is without insight into proof. This branch did not permit ablution with date wine, as he called it a drink and removed the name water from it, so understand, and God speaks the truth and He guides the path.