As for the internal ruling on that, it is that knowledge of God in terms of the mind that he acquired through thought, if it is mixed with a legal description of what the Sharia brought, then that knowledge of God is pure in itself, not purified, because of the attribute of resemblance that is indicated by it, such as their saying regarding the attribute of the speech of God that it is Like a chain on Safwan, and he brought all of the characteristics, and the entire Sharia is clear and acceptable. What he brought was accepted, so the mind was unable to escape from its evidence in denying the likeness, and it surrendered to the Sharia what it brought without interpretation. And whoever sees that it is purified in its original form unless it is cooked, then by cooking he meant the natural thing, which is not to take that description from The legislator who informs about God and takes it from his understanding and consideration by applying an analogy to himself in terms of his abilit