Then we go back and say that since faith is the purity of the inner, it is not possible to imagine the difference in it as it was imagined in the outer purity, except in a precise way in which the ruling of the apparent in the inner is the ruling of the inner in the purity of the outer, so we say from that perspective, is it a condition of the purity of the inner with faith that it should be uttered? So the tongue says what the heart believes, whether it is that or not, and in the world of the unseen if he does not appear to be a hypocrite with what he believes in the interior, like the apparent hypocrite in the world of testimony, the believer believes that prayer is obligatory, for example, but does not pray or purify himself, just as the hypocrite prays and purifies himself and does not believe in its obligation for him in his heart and does not believe it or not. He does it based on the saying of that Messenger who legislated it for him. This is the meaning of that, if you inv