If he knows this power, which he knows is beyond the stage of reason, is it still for him to judge what the mind was referring to in terms of his first thought to what it was, or not? If it is not left for him to judge that this is impossible, then he must find the way in which it occurred to him. The mistake is without a doubt, and that which he took as evidence for referring this to God was not evidence in the matter itself, and if this is the case, then what is that matter that is beyond the stage of the mind, for the mind may be correct or it may be wrong, even if it remains for the mind after revealing and verifying the validity of this matter that God attributed to Himself and described. Through Him Himself, and the minds of the prophets accepted Him, and the mind of this Revealer accepted Him without a doubt or doubt. Despite this, He judges God that this matter is rationally impossible in terms of His thought, not in terms of His acceptance. Then it is correct for that pos