And know that the hosts must have a name given to each of the hosts by the addition. If you say Zaid, he is a human being without a doubt, and nothing can be understood of him other than this. If you say Amr, he is a human being of whom nothing can be understood other than this. If you say Zaid bin Amr or Zaid, the servant of Amr, then there is no doubt. That it occurred to Zaid that he was the son of Amr, and that the name of fatherhood occurred to Amr since he was the father of Zaid. So the sonship of Zaid gave fatherhood to Amr, and the fatherhood to Amr gave sonship to Zaid, so each one of the two hosts created a meaning for its owner that was not described with it before the addition. Likewise, Zaid was the slave of Amr, so Al-Aboodah gave Zaid to be a mamluk. And Amr is Malik. The kingdom of Zaid gave birth to the name “Malik” to Amr, and the kingdom of Amr gave Zaid the kingdom of Zaid, so it was said about him “Malik” and it was said about “Amr Malik,” and neither of them