Two imams, then the contract is for the most followed, and if it is not possible to remove an incomplete imam due to the occurrence of comprehensive corruption, then maintaining the contract is obligatory for him, and it is not permissible to reject him, Al-Shadi said, so each of the four fulfilled what was stipulated, and existence was organized and connected.

As for what follows, minds have a limit to which they stand in terms of what they are thinkers, not in terms of what they are capable of, so we say in a matter that is impossible with reason that it may not be impossible in a divine relationship, just as we say in what is permissible by reason that it may be impossible in a divine relationship

Any correspondence between the necessary truth that exists by itself and the possible, even if it is obligatory for those who say so due to the necessity of the essence or the necessity of knowledge and its intellectual basis, is validly established from existential proofs, and between the evidence and the signified and the proof and the demonstrated must have some aspect through which the connection is relative to the evidence. And in relation to the signified by that evidence, and if it were not for that aspect, the signifier would never have reached the meaning of his evidence, so it is not correct for creation and truth to ever meet in a face in terms of the essence, but since this essence is attributed to divinity, this is another ruling that the minds are independent in perceiving, and everything that the mind is independent in perceiving with us is possible. That knowledge of it takes precedence over its witnesses, and the essence of the Almighty Truth is clear of this ruli

How can one be restricted by knowledge of the absolute and its essence does not require it? How can the possible reach the knowledge of the necessary in itself? There is no aspect of the possible except that it is permissible for it to be nothingness, obscurity, and lack. If he combined the obligatory in itself with the possible, then it would be permissible for the obligatory to do what is permissible for the possible in that aspect of obscurity and lack. This is impossible in relation to the obligatory, as proving a universal aspect between the obligatory and the possible is impossible, for the aspects of the possible depend on it, and in itself it is permissible for non-existence, so its consequences are more likely and deserving of this ruling. For the obligatory in itself, the existence of a combined aspect between the possible and the obligatory in itself is impossible

But I say that divinity has rulings, even if they are a ruling, and in the form of these rulings the manifestation occurs in the afterlife wherever it was, for there was disagreement about the Prophet, peace be upon him, seeing his Lord, as mentioned, and the hadith of the greatest light came in the flap of pearls and rubies and other things .

I say by voluntary judgment, but I do not say by choice, for the discourse of choice that was mentioned was stated in terms of looking at the possible, revealing its cause and causality .

So I say, according to what Al-Kashf Al-I'tisami gave, that God was, and nothing was with Him until here. His word, peace be upon him, ended and what came after this is included in it, and it is their saying, and it is now as it is. They wanted it to be in the ruling, and now, and two matters were returning to us, as we built the noon and their likes, and they have There is no occasion, and what is said about him is God and there is nothing with him, but he is divinity, not the essence, and every ruling that is established in the chapter on the divine knowledge of the essence is only for divinity, and they are rulings of lineage, additions, and method, so the abundance is in the lineage, not in the eye, and here the feet of polytheism between those who accept the resemblance and those who do not have disappeared. He accepts it when they speak about the attributes, and they relied in that on the comprehensive matters which are the evidence, the truth, the reason, and the condition,

The Sea of Blindness is an isthmus between Truth and Creation. In this sea, the Possible is described as All-Knowing, All-Powerful, and all the divine names that are in our hands. Truth is described with wonder, rejoicing, laughter, joy, joy, and most cosmic epithets. Return his money and take your money. For Him is the descent, and for us is the ascension.

The one who seeks to create everything other than God Almighty is divinity with its rulings, lineages, and additions, and it is what called for the effects, for being subjugating without being oppressed, and powerful without having power, validity, existence, power, and action are impossible