Considering this in oneself

What is reprehensible, disliked, and vile in a person is the nakedness of the truth, and the two bad deeds are subject to what we have mentioned, so they are in the status of what is forbidden, and except for the two bad deeds, what goes beyond them, from the navel above them and from the knee below, is in the status of suspicions, so he should be pious. The fever surrounding fever is about to occur.

So who says that all of it is awrah, except for the face and hands? And who says that and adds that her feet are not awrah? And who says that it is all awrah? As for our doctrine, the woman’s awrah is also not except the two evil parts, as God Almighty said. And they began to cover over themselves from the leaves of Paradise, so He equaled Adam and Eve in covering the two garments. They are the two private parts, and if a woman is commanded to cover, then that is our doctrine, but not because she is a private person, but rather that is a legitimate ruling that is stated in covering, and it is not necessary for something to be covered because it is private.

Considering that in the soul

The woman is the self. All psychological thoughts are private, so whoever excludes the face, palms, and feet, it is because the face is the place of knowledge, because if the issue does not know its face, then you do not know it, and if the face of a thing is hidden from you, and you

Scholars have agreed that a single garment is sufficient for a man to dress during prayer

Considering it in oneself

The one who is united in prayer is the one who does not see himself in it, but rather sees that the truth He raises him up and makes him sit while he is like a dead person in the hands of the washer. This is the meaning of one garment.

Some people held that his prayer was permissible, and some people held that his prayer was not permissible

Considering the self in that

The external and the internal, and it is an action The heart is in prayer and the work of the limbs. If the man who is praying is revealed to him outwardly and inwardly in his prayer, he does not see himself as praying, but rather sees himself praying with it. This is in the same position as one who says that his prayer is invalid. For the one who has this revelation, according to this view, the addition of prayer to him is invalidated even though the prayer has occurred from him and whoever has this revelation. He said: The matter can only be like this, and with this amount of action, he is called a praying person. He said that his prayer is permissible.

The majority agreed on the shield and veil, and if she prays uncovered, some say she should repeat it at the time and after it, and some say she should repeat it at the time. As for the owned woman, some say she prays with her head and feet uncovered, some say it is obligatory to cover her head, and some say it is desirable to cover her head.

Consideration The soul in this matter

There is no difference between the owned and the free, for everything belongs to God, so there is no freedom from God. If freedom is added to the throat, then it is their departure from the slavery of others, not from the slavery of the truth, that is, there is no created being over whose hearts there is a path or rule. This is the meaning of freedom in The way has been discussed about the single garment, and the consideration remains regarding covering the head here. Know that since the woman was in mind the soul and the head from leadership, and the soul loves to appear in the world wit