Know that purity is two purities: purity that is not reasonable in meaning, which is purity from impurity that prevents prayer, and purity from impurity, which is reasonable in meaning, for its meaning is cleanliness. Is it a condition for the validity of prayer, like the purity of one who has committed impurity from impurity, or is it not a condition? So who says that purity from impurity is an absolute obligation and not As a condition for the validity of prayer, and who says that it is obligatory, like purity from impurity, which is a condition for the validity of prayer, and who says that it is a confirmed Sunnah, and who says that removing it is obligatory along with remembrance is void, due to forgetfulness.

Know that purity in our way is two purities, an incomprehensible purity in meaning, which is purity from impurity, and impurity is a psychological description of the servant, so how can a thing be purified of its reality, for if it is purified of its reality, its essence is removed, and if its essence is removed, then who is responsible for worship, and so on. Except God. This is why we said that purity from impurity is incomprehensible in meaning. The form of purity from impurity for us is that the truth is your hearing, your sight, and your wholeness in all your acts of worship, so He established you and denied you, so you are you in terms of your essence and He is in terms of your actions and perceptions .

You are responsible in the sense that your eye is the place of speech, and He is the agent of you in the sense that you have no action, since the event has no effect on the action itself, but it has a ruling on the action, since what the Truth assigned it of movement and rest, the Truth cannot do except with the presence of the moving and the still, since there is no If the servant does not exist, there is no truth, and God is exalted above movement and rest, or is the subject of His influence in Himself, then the servant must occur in order for Him to be the subject of the influence of Truth .

Since it is an event, the servant must be purified from it, then the prayer, which is the essence of the apparent action in it, cannot be from it because it has no trace of it. Rather, it is a cause, in terms of its specificity, for the divine effect to appear in it. So with purity from the action’s consideration of its occurrence, the actions are valid as being from something other than Him, with the presence of the eye. For the validity of an act that is not accepted by the right itself

This is not the case with purity from the impurity, for the impurity is the immorality of morals, and it is reasonable in meaning, for it is cleanliness. Purity from the impurities is the purification of good morals and the removal of their immorality from the souls, so it is the purity of the souls, whether you intend it to worship or not. If you intend worship, then virtue upon virtue, and light upon light, and if not. You mean virtue and nothing else, for good morals are required for their own sake, and their highest status is to use them as an act of worship by purifying them from impurities and removing impurities from souls, which we said is morality. What is obligatory for us is that it is a condition for the validity of worship, for God has made it an independent act of worship required for its own sake, so it is, like all other obligatory duties, obligatory with remembrance and void with forgetfulness. Whenever you remember it, it is obligatory like the obligatory prayer.

The scholars, may God be pleased with them, agreed among the most prominent of them on four matters: the dead animal of an animal with blood that is not watery, on pork meat for any reason whose life is agreed to be lost, and on the blood itself from an animal that is not watery, separated from the living or from the dead body if it is.