For the light of faith is included in the lights of science, just as the lights of the planets are included in the light of the sun, and its method is also clear in returning similarity to knowledge because it removes its ruling and the light of faith shows him the face of truth in it, so he sees it as nothingness, and nothingness has no trace or effect in existence, so know that and know that the light of faith here is a statement. Regarding the matter of the Sharia, that is, adhere to what I told you and commanded you to do, whether you find rational evidence for it or not, such as believing in the divine presence by running, laughing, rejoicing, and marveling without any qualification or comparison with the plausibility of that on the tongue, but we do not know the ratio due to our reliance on the Almighty’s saying, “There is nothing like Him,” and it is what I mean. This verse is the basis for showing respect to its people and the basis for making similarities to its people .<

Sharia scholars differed regarding water mixed with impurity and none of its descriptions were changed. So who says that it is pure and purified, whether it is a little or a lot, and I say that, except that I say that it is purified but not pure in itself, because we know for sure that impurity was mixed with it, but Sharia has forgiven it, and I do not know this opinion of anyone. It is reasonable, and we do not have evidence from the Sharia that it is pure in itself, but it is pure, even if they argue against us

that the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said, “God created water to be pure and not impure by anything.

We said what he said.” He is pure in himself, but he said that he is pure, and purity is water and dirt that purify other things .

As we said, we know for sure that water is a carrier of impurity from reason, but the Lawgiver did not make it have an effect on a person’s purity with it, nor did he call it impure. The Lawgiver may want to introduce the truth of the matter, which is that water in itself is pure in every way, and it has never been ruled impure, meaning that impurity is not a characteristic. For him, but the parts of the impurity are adjacent to its parts, so when it is difficult to separate the parts of urine, for example, from the parts of water, and the parts of the impurity are greater than the parts of the water, and one of its characteristics is changed, it is forbidden to perform ablution with it according to the law according to the limit considered in the law. And if the parts of the water predominate over the parts of the impurity, and none of its characteristics are changed, neither the law nor the law considers it to be the same. He made it a ruling on purification with it, for we know

The ruling on water, as we have mentioned, is divided into four levels: whether impurity is mixed with it or not, it is ruled to be pure and purified, it is ruled to be pure but not purified, it is ruled to be neither purified nor pure, and it is ruled to be purified but not purified. Pure and purified water is water that has not been mixed with impurity, and pure but not purified is water. Water that is mixed with something that is not impure, such that the name pure water is removed from it, such as saffron water and other things, and it is ruled that it is neither pure nor purifying. It is water in which impurity has changed one of its characteristics. The author of this ruling rejects the hadith that he used as evidence for us. The legislator said that nothing makes it impure. So how do I consider this to be the case? What is being used as evidence here, and he did not consider it in the sense that we went to, that it is purified but not pure, and it is necessary for him to do

Then these people differed regarding the definition between little and many, and the disagreement regarding the same definition is well-known in the schools of thought, not in the text of the authentic Sharia, for the hadiths in this matter have been discussed, such as the hadith of two days and the hadith of forty, a few. Then the disagreement between them regarding the definition of a few and branches out. There are many issues on this topic, such as the occurrence of water on impurity, the occurrence of impurity on water, urination in standing water, and so on. People have many schools of thought regarding this, and this book is not the place for it. We did not intend to investigate all the rulings related to this purity from the point of view of branching out the issues, but rather we intended to summarize them for the sake of consideration. In this chapter, we have included in this section about eighty chapters, which we will mention, God willing, all of them, chapter