He denied the analogy to the oneness of every person by saying, “And there is no one equal to Him.” He affirmed his “oneness,” and “we are not for anyone other than Him.” He affirmed his steadfastness, which is an attribute of purification and exoneration. So he raised that the pronoun refers to the aforementioned Lord added to the creation in their saying to him, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, “Attribute your Lord to us,” so they added him to Him. Not to them, and when he attributed it, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, with what was revealed to him, he did not add it to him or to them, but rather reminded him of what His Majesty deserves. So if the pronoun in “He is God” does not refer to the one mentioned, and where is the absolute from the restricted, then the identity of the restricted is not the identity of the absolute, for the identity of the restricted is a relation related to the universe, so it is restricted by it as it is restricted. The universe is sa

And know that the monotheism with which the servant is commanded to teach or say is not the monotheism with which the Truth unites itself, for the monotheism of the matter is complex, for the one commanded to do that is a created being, and nothing emanates from the created thing except what suits it, and it is created from a created being, so it is farther in creation from God than the One who existed. From him is this monotheism

on every doctrine of the negation of actions on behalf of created beings and those who confirm them, because the negators are those who believe in earning, and the non-negators are those who believe in creation. So how is it appropriate for the Mighty Majestic that which is added to creation, even if we worshiped it according to the law, then we establish it in its place and say it as we have commanded it in the same way? The closeness to Him is established in what we have already witnessed, the truth of knowledge of Him, from the fact that He is