I performed the etiquette of the truth in giving Him everything He created. This is the section of the etiquette of the truth.

As for the section of the etiquette of the truth

His condition is for him to see it in the things themselves, not the same, and then he judges what he sees of them. Increase and decrease are due to what the dispositions of things have given him, so that is attributed to them, not to him, whether perfection or deficiency, or agreeing or disagreeing, not excluding anything. The state of truth gives what we said. If your condition is in every position that we mentioned, then you have exercised discipline and taken all the goodness with both hands and filled them with goodness, and this is the ultimate limit of the creation’s scope. And God guides whom He wills to a straight path, and talking about conditions cannot be extended, and it is enough to point to what is intended .

If a person refines his own morals*** and takes them away from their nature and desires

And that is impossible for us because it is not seen by those who are satisfied with it by those who are satisfied with it due to its stubbornness .

If you are knowledgeable, then there are ways to protect it from it that are determined by the Sharia when it becomes corrupt .

Know that exercise among the people is one of the conditions, and it is of two types: the sport of manners and the sport of pursuit .

So the sport of manners is

For them, it is a departure from the nature of the soul.

And the sport of pursuit is

It is the correctness of what is meant by it. I mean by request.

And with us, exercise is the refinement of morals, for departing from the nature of the soul is not valid, and since it is not valid, God has shown that this nature has consequences, so if the souls stop there, they praise and thank and do not depart from that. Regarding its nature, its exercise is limited to the conditions that its Creator has appointed for it, for the essence of a dispositional thing is nothing other than its disposition. If a thing were to deviate from its nature, it would not be it. This is why the statement of the one who said the exercise of request is the correctness of what is meant by it, for if a thing is