Whoever talks to him and he is God, and just as he does not occupy himself with his tongue except for the words of his Lord or his remembrance of which he legislated, nothing of the words of people is true in it. Likewise, it is forbidden for him in his innermost to talk with those who share with him or pledge allegiance to him or talk to him inwardly in the same prayer of family, son, brothers and authority For this reason, it is not required for the imam to have a great deal of knowledge, but the purpose is what is appropriate for this situation.

[ The wisdom of the legality of the rows in prayer ]

The rows were only initiated in prayer so that a person would remember his standing before God on the Day of Resurrection in that dreadful place and the intercessors of the prophets, believers and angels are in the position of imams in prayer leading the rows. What a heartbreak for a person praying tomorrow, and their rows in prayer are like the rows of angels with God, as the Almighty said, and the angels are in a row, and he said, And the angels are in a row. It is necessary within its row, if it happens that a defect, I mean the angels of heaven, enters the devils, because the sky is not a place for demons or a place, but rather they are stacked in proportion to the lights until they are connected to each other, so they descend continuously to the rows of the worshipers, and those lights blind them. They are in the dune in the general falsehood, describing as they describe in prayer, so whoever enters it has a defect in his line here and was able to block it himself, and he did not do it, he was forbidden there in that place. His blessing, and if he is not able to block it, his aunt is the blessing there, and every one who prays between two men, he joins one of them and then attracts the other to him. And he is able to reach it, and he does not walk to the first row until he completes it.

( Chapter and pray in the one who is praying behind the row alone )

[ The ruling on the one praying behind the row alone from the legal point of view ]

People differed about it, so whoever says that his prayer is valid, and whoever says that it is not valid, and the one to whom I go with a ruling in this case, he is not free, either he will find a way to enter the class or he does not find, and if he does not find it, then point out to a man from the people of the class that he is confused with him, and if he does not mix with him. Because he was ignorant of the reward he has in that with God, the prayer of this man is valid, for he feared God as much as he could, and in this case he is not able to do more than this. He is the only one to repeat, and it is the hadith of Wabisah bin Ma`bad

( Considering that in oneself )

The closeness to God is not known except from God, the mind has no ruling in it in any way. According to what we have said, either he is from the people of ijtihad, and his ruling is based on the permission of that action and the validity of his prayer based on ijtihad, or he is not based on ijtihad. Nor from a question, his prayer is invalid, and so in all legitimate acts of worship, just as the imam s prayer in front of the congregation without a row is valid, the prayer of one who is behind the row alone is valid. Alone, and the appearance of a person is a group, so he is within himself a row alone, for every part of it is charged with worship and prayer, and some of it is not separated from each other, so he is a row alone. Sentence only in a row and from where His kindness alone, for she does not accept rows for lack of bias, and this is on the doctrine of those who say that they are not biased.