( Chapter on the order of the acts of ablution )

[ Scholars differ in the order of ablution acts ]

The scholars differed in the order of the acts of ablution according to what was mentioned in the verse format, so who says that the order is necessary and who says that it is not obligatory, and this is in the obligatory acts.

( According to the ruling on that in the subconscious )

As for the ruling on that in the interior, there is no arrangement, but you do from that according to what has been assigned to you at the time.

( Chapter on Continuity in Ablution )

[ Differences of the jurists regarding conciliation in ablution ]

Whoever says that loyalty is obligatory with the dhikr and the lack of excuse falls with forgetfulness, and with the dhikr when the excuse is not exaggerated, as long as the disparity does not increase. The two actions are together, and this is not justified in ablution except for immersion in a river or people pouring water on it in the same state for each member.

( The loyalties arrived in the subconscious )

[ Our doctrine of loyalty is that it is not obligatory ]

Our view of the internal rule of loyalty is that it is not obligatory, and that is the same as arranging, whether we do it according to what time requires, and we have mentioned the equivalent of this issue in the Risala al-Anwar regarding the secrets granted to the owner of seclusion.

[ The works of the road are according to time and what is given ]

So our actions in this way are according to the rule of time and what He gives, for man has been written in negligence, so he is not able to be loyal to him, but for an hour and an hour, it is not in the power of human beings to observe God in secret and openly with breath. All of his actions, God Almighty said, are those who are continually in their prayers, and what is meant by it is that whenever its time comes, they do it, and if there are matters between the two prayers, that is why the permanence occurred in a special action linked to different times. It happened to some of the men of God, and it rarely happened

[ The Messenger of God, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, used to remember God at all times .]

Or

Aisha said: The Messenger of God, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, used to remember God at all times

If she transmitted it from the Messenger of God, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, then we have no doubts about it, and if she meant by that that all his apparent actions that occurred from him are never permissible and that he is still in an obligation or recommended, then that is possible and it is apparent from his rank. Inwardly, peace be upon him, she has no knowledge of it except by informing him, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, and with this it is imagined that his attainment with us with the disposition of the permissible with his presence in it is permissible, and likewise if he brings the rule of the law in all his movements and stillness with this reward, then he is one of those who achieved loyalty in his worship Ended part thirty-first

( Chapter on wiping over the socks )

( In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful )

[ The scholars differed regarding wiping over the socks ]

As for wiping over the socks, Sharia scholars differed about it. Some say that it is absolutely permissible, and some say that it is not permissible at all, such as Ibn Abbas and a narration on the authority of Malik.

( It arrived in the judgment of the subconscious in it )

[ Purity is purity, and truth is what is meant by purification .]

As for the internal ruling regarding wiping over the socks, know that it is a matter that is presented to a person as difficult for the one who is offered to take it off, just as it is difficult to take off the slipper for the wearer. And pride is prevention, so he mentioned that his essence refused to be the object of what the atheists described him with

[ The scholars honor with God is only knowledge, not action .]

The truth is self-exalted for Himself what He makes His servant exalted above Him, so the scholars honoring of God the Truth, Glory be to Him, is only knowledge, not action, for if transcendence from the creation, their god, was a deed, then God, who is the Exalted, would be subject to the effect of this action. His servants in so far as they are doers, for no one sees transcendence as a deed except for the ignorant of the servants, for the knowledgeable sees it as knowledge, and if he speaks of it, he only speaks of it in terms of definition, which is the command upon himself, which is his saying and his remembrance, so the effect of his action is only