Because His Beautiful Names ask us *** what we have brought in the truth of the news

And I am not an angel whose faces mean to us *** at the appearance of the angelic and the human beings

[ Beginning and repeating are two rulings .]

Its owner is called Abd al-Ma id, for He Almighty initiates and restores, so beginning and repetition are two judgments for Him, for He did not return anything after it was gone, except that in finding the proverbs, He returned to creation. There is no existing created by the truth except that it has finished its creation, then that existing one looks at God Almighty, it has returned to creating another eye like this forever and ever. He finished it by looking at it and he returned to the judgment in another matter, so the rule of repetition in it is different from the rule of the principle, for he initiates everything into creation and then returns it, that is, the judgment returns to him that he creates and it is his saying and he is the one who initiates creation and then restores it, i.e. restores creation, i.e. He does in the eye What he wants to find is what he did about the one who created it, and nothing but creation, for creation means the creature in a place like His saying, This is the creation of God, and he wants the action by it in a place like His saying I made them witness is the creation of the heavens, and here he intends the action undoubtedly because a creature has no action at all. it has a verb God is because the creature has no action and does not testify from God except what it is in itself. He may return the creation and mean the creature by it, as we have decided not the action, so we made his saying and he is the one who begins the creation and then repeats it that he means here the act and not the creature, because the creature's eye is still from existence and I mean It is the self existing in itself, but it moved from the world to the isthmus as it moves from the isthmus to the gathering to heaven or to the fire and it is in terms of its essence, not that it did not exist and then it exists, so the repetition is in its right, it is a transition from existence to existence from station to station from house to house because The upbringing that you create in the Hereafter is not similar to the origin of the world except in the name of the offspring, so the emergence of the Hereafter is a beginning. He has to exist in what he creates from what is in him for his permanence. The repetition is only in the fact that the right returns to creation in view of the ruling of what he has finished creating from this creature and then We created him for another creation, so what God mentioned he returned except that if he wanted to do as he said then if he wanted to spread it, both of them but he did not want start emptying So he returned to the rule of initiation, this is a divine rule that does not go away, so the rule of repetition is what its rule is outside the truth, so its rule is in it not in the creation that is the created, the world after its existence moves in new conditions that God creates for him, so the right continues to create and returns to creation, so there is no god but He is over all. omnipotent thing

Al-Muhyi , honor of the living.

Rather, the reviver who revives *** is like spreading a garment out of folds

So when I was told you give life *** I said, "My Lord is the one who gives life"

And he is my master and my document *** and the remover of adulterous rationality

And if I come to questions *** I have more nights

I am not in good and in laxity *** whenever I am called for something

[ The life of things is an abundance of the life of truth over them ]

Its owner is called Abd al-Muhyi, and he is the one who gives life to everything, then there is only a living person, because there is then only one who praises God with His praise, and only a living person glorifies Him, whether he is dead or not dead, for he is alive because life for things is an abundance of the life of the truth over them, so it is alive in the case of its confirmation No, her life, I did not hear his saying, Be with the words that befit His majesty, and it was. Rather, it was life, because the life of things is from the abundance of the name of the neighborhood, as the sun s light from the sun that spreads over places, and things did not disappear from him, neither in the case of its evidence nor in the case of its existence. I do not like the afflicted, for the god is not from the departed, and the living is one of His Names, the Most High, and death is not one of His names, for it gives life and dies, and death is not the removal of life from it in the same matter and with the people of revelation, but death isolates the ruler and takes over and no because it is not possible for the world to remain without and does not preserve its interests lest it spoil based on