In sense from the point of view of its totality, but from the point of view of the parts of that sentence, if the pictorial force depicted that from the matter of the mind by the force of thought, then that is because it seeks knowledge of a matter, and knowledge is undoubtedly restricted, even if what the pictorial image depicted was from the matter of illusion, not in terms of what the mind acted upon. From the rule of illusion, but from the illusion itself, for that form does not remain, for the illusion is quick to disappear when it is called in contrast to the mind, for it is restricted and imprisoned by what it has benefited from, and since the rule of illusions predominates over creation, due to the power of illusion over the mind, it has affected it. It does not accept a meaning that it knows for certain that it is neither matter nor in matter. Except by perception, and that perception is nothing other than the image by which only illusion can judge, so the mind has become