So that they may find an excuse in proving it. Whoever proves it by reason is a person of worship, and whoever proves it by reason is a polytheist, even if he is a believer. So, not every believer is united based on the witnessing insight that God has given him, and he has knowledge of the rank of what is permissible from the laws, and what they have defined with it that there is no reward in it and no burden is true, or is it true? No, is there a reward for his actions and omissions, and for what he sees of God’s actions and for what he rules about God, for there is nothing similar to them except the choice attributed to God. If it is not proven that there is a choice according to the definition of choice, then it is not proven here that it is permissible according to the definition of what is permissible, because it is what it is, and in it there is knowledge of what He knows. The created thing, and that it is limited and restricted, cannot be attributed to Him at all in knowled